Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction

The Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction is a continued fraction discovered by Rogers (1894) and independently by Srinivasa Ramanujan, and closely related to the Rogers–Ramanujan identities. It can be evaluated explicitly for a broad class of values of its argument.

Given the functions ${\displaystyle G(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle H(q)}$ appearing in the Rogers–Ramanujan identities, and assume ${\displaystyle q=e^{2\pi i\tau }}$,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}G(q)&=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {q^{n^{2}}}{(1-q)(1-q^{2})\cdots (1-q^{n})}}=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {q^{n^{2}}}{(q;q)_{n}}}={\frac {1}{(q;q^{5})_{\infty }(q^{4};q^{5})_{\infty }}}\\[6pt]&=\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{(1-q^{5n-1})(1-q^{5n-4})}}\\[6pt]&={\sqrt[{60}]{q\,j}}\,\,_{2}F_{1}\left(-{\tfrac {1}{60}},{\tfrac {19}{60}};{\tfrac {4}{5}};{\tfrac {1728}{j}}\right)\\[6pt]&={\sqrt[{60}]{q\left(j-1728\right)}}\,_{2}F_{1}\left(-{\tfrac {1}{60}},{\tfrac {29}{60}};{\tfrac {4}{5}};-{\tfrac {1728}{j-1728}}\right)\\[6pt]&=1+q+q^{2}+q^{3}+2q^{4}+2q^{5}+3q^{6}+\cdots \end{aligned}}}$

and,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}H(q)&=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {q^{n^{2}+n}}{(1-q)(1-q^{2})\cdots (1-q^{n})}}=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {q^{n^{2}+n}}{(q;q)_{n}}}={\frac {1}{(q^{2};q^{5})_{\infty }(q^{3};q^{5})_{\infty }}}\\[6pt]&=\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{(1-q^{5n-2})(1-q^{5n-3})}}\\[6pt]&={\frac {1}{\sqrt[{60}]{q^{11}j^{11}}}}\,_{2}F_{1}\left({\tfrac {11}{60}},{\tfrac {31}{60}};{\tfrac {6}{5}};{\tfrac {1728}{j}}\right)\\[6pt]&={\frac {1}{\sqrt[{60}]{q^{11}\left(j-1728\right)^{11}}}}\,_{2}F_{1}\left({\tfrac {11}{60}},{\tfrac {41}{60}};{\tfrac {6}{5}};-{\tfrac {1728}{j-1728}}\right)\\[6pt]&=1+q^{2}+q^{3}+q^{4}+q^{5}+2q^{6}+2q^{7}+\cdots \end{aligned}}}$

with the coefficients of the q-expansion being OEIS: A003114 and OEIS: A003106, respectively, where ${\displaystyle (a;q)_{\infty }}$ denotes the infinite q-Pochhammer symbol, j is the j-function, and ₂F₁ is the hypergeometric function. The Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction is then

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}R(q)&={\frac {q^{\frac {11}{60}}H(q)}{q^{-{\frac {1}{60}}}G(q)}}=q^{\frac {1}{5}}\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {(1-q^{5n-1})(1-q^{5n-4})}{(1-q^{5n-2})(1-q^{5n-3})}}=q^{1/5}\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }(1-q^{n})^{(n|5)}\\[8pt]&={\cfrac {q^{1/5}}{1+{\cfrac {q}{1+{\cfrac {q^{2}}{1+{\cfrac {q^{3}}{1+\ddots }}}}}}}}\end{aligned}}}$

${\displaystyle (n\mid m)}$ is the Jacobi symbol.

One should be careful with notation since the formulas employing the j-function ${\displaystyle j}$ will be consistent with the other formulas only if ${\displaystyle q=e^{2\pi i\tau }}$ (the square of the nome) is used throughout this section since the q-expansion of the j-function (as well as the well-known Dedekind eta function) uses ${\displaystyle q=e^{2\pi i\tau }}$. However, Ramanujan, in his examples to Hardy and given below, used the nome ${\displaystyle q=e^{\pi i\tau }}$instead.

If q is the nome or its square, then ${\displaystyle q^{-{\frac {1}{60}}}G(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle q^{\frac {11}{60}}H(q)}$, as well as their quotient ${\displaystyle R(q)}$, are related to modular functions of ${\displaystyle \tau }$. Since they have integral coefficients, the theory of complex multiplication implies that their values for ${\displaystyle \tau }$ involving an imaginary quadratic field are algebraic numbers that can be evaluated explicitly.

Given the general form where Ramanujan used the nome ${\displaystyle q=e^{\pi i\tau }}$,

${\displaystyle R(q)={\cfrac {q^{1/5}}{1+{\cfrac {q}{1+{\cfrac {q^{2}}{1+{\cfrac {q^{3}}{1+\ddots }}}}}}}}}$

f when ${\displaystyle \tau =i}$,

${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-\pi }{\big )}={\cfrac {e^{-{\frac {\pi }{5}}}}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-\pi }}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-2\pi }}{1+\ddots }}}}}}={\tfrac {1}{2}}\varphi \,({\sqrt {5}}-\varphi ^{3/2})({\sqrt[{4}]{5}}+\varphi ^{3/2})=0.511428\dots }$

when ${\displaystyle \tau =2i}$,

${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-2\pi }{\big )}={\cfrac {e^{-{\frac {2\pi }{5}}}}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-2\pi }}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-4\pi }}{1+\ddots }}}}}}={{\sqrt[{4}]{5}}\,\varphi ^{1/2}-\varphi }=0.284079\dots }$

when ${\displaystyle \tau =4i}$,

${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-4\pi }{\big )}={\cfrac {e^{-{\frac {4\pi }{5}}}}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-4\pi }}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-8\pi }}{1+\ddots }}}}}}={\tfrac {1}{2}}\varphi \,({\sqrt {5}}-\varphi ^{3/2})(-{\sqrt[{4}]{5}}+\varphi ^{3/2})=0.081002\dots }$

when ${\displaystyle \tau =2{\sqrt {5}}i}$,

${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-2{\sqrt {5}}\pi }{\big )}={\cfrac {e^{-{\frac {2\pi }{\sqrt {5}}}}}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-2\pi {\sqrt {5}}}}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-4\pi {\sqrt {5}}}}{1+\ddots }}}}}}={\frac {\sqrt {5}}{1+{\big (}5^{3/4}(\varphi -1)^{5/2}-1{\big )}^{1/5}}}-\varphi =0.0602094\dots }$

when ${\displaystyle \tau =5i}$,

${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-5\pi }{\big )}={\cfrac {e^{-\pi }}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-5\pi }}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-10\pi }}{1+\ddots }}}}}}={\frac {1+\varphi ^{2}}{\varphi +{\big (}{\frac {1}{2}}(4-\varphi -3{\sqrt {\varphi -1}})(3\varphi ^{3/2}-{\sqrt[{4}]{5}}){\big )}^{1/5}}}-\varphi =0.0432139\dots }$

when ${\displaystyle \tau =10i}$,

${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-10\pi }{\big )}={\cfrac {e^{-2\pi }}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-10\pi }}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-20\pi }}{1+\ddots }}}}}}={\frac {1+\varphi ^{2}}{\varphi +{\big (}3{\sqrt {1+\varphi ^{2}}}-4-\varphi {\big )}^{1/5}}}-\varphi =0.00186744\dots }$

when ${\displaystyle \tau =20i}$,

${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-20\pi }{\big )}={\cfrac {e^{-4\pi }}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-20\pi }}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-40\pi }}{1+\ddots }}}}}}={\frac {1+\varphi ^{2}}{\varphi +{\big (}{\frac {1}{2}}(4-\varphi -3{\sqrt {\varphi -1}})(3\varphi ^{3/2}+{\sqrt[{4}]{5}}){\big )}^{1/5}}}-\varphi =0.00000348734\dots }$

and ${\displaystyle \varphi ={\tfrac {1+{\sqrt {5}}}{2}}}$ is the golden ratio. Note that ${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-2\pi }{\big )}}$ is a positive root of the quartic equation,

${\displaystyle x^{4}+2x^{3}-6x^{2}-2x+1=0}$

while ${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-\pi }{\big )}}$ and ${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-4\pi }{\big )}}$ are two positive roots of a single octic,

${\displaystyle y^{4}+2\varphi ^{4}y^{3}+6\varphi ^{2}y^{2}-2\varphi ^{4}y+1=0}$

(since ${\displaystyle \varphi }$ has a square root) which explains the similarity of the two closed-forms. More generally, for positive integer m, then ${\displaystyle R(e^{-2\pi /m})}$ and ${\displaystyle R(e^{-2\pi \,m})}$ are two roots of the same equation as well as,

${\displaystyle {\bigl [}R(e^{-2\pi /m})+\varphi {\bigr ]}{\bigl [}R(e^{-2\pi \,m})+\varphi {\bigr ]}={\sqrt {5}}\,\varphi }$

The algebraic degree k of ${\displaystyle R(e^{-\pi \,n})}$ for ${\displaystyle n=1,2,3,4,\dots }$ is ${\displaystyle k=8,4,32,8,\dots }$ (OEIS: A082682).

Incidentally, these continued fractions can be used to solve some quintic equations as shown in a later section.

Interestingly, there are explicit formulas for ${\displaystyle G(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle H(q)}$ in terms of the j-function ${\displaystyle j(\tau )}$ and the Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction ${\displaystyle R(q)}$. However, since ${\displaystyle j(\tau )}$ uses the nome's square ${\displaystyle q=e^{2\pi \,i\tau }}$, then one should be careful with notation such that ${\displaystyle j(\tau ),\,G(q),\,H(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle r=R(q)}$ use the same ${\displaystyle q}$.

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}G(q)&=\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{(1-q^{5n-1})(1-q^{5n-4})}}\\[6pt]&=q^{1/60}{\frac {j(\tau )^{1/60}}{(r^{20}-228r^{15}+494r^{10}+228r^{5}+1)^{1/20}}}\end{aligned}}}$

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}H(q)&=\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{(1-q^{5n-2})(1-q^{5n-3})}}\\[6pt]&={\frac {-1}{q^{11/60}}}{\frac {(r^{20}-228r^{15}+494r^{10}+228r^{5}+1)^{11/20}}{j(\tau )^{11/60}\,(r^{10}+11r^{5}-1)}}\end{aligned}}}$

Of course, the secondary formulas imply that ${\displaystyle q^{-1/60}G(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle q^{11/60}H(q)}$ are algebraic numbers (though normally of high degree) for ${\displaystyle \tau }$ involving an imaginary quadratic field. For example, the formulas above simplify to,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}G(e^{-2\pi })&=(e^{-2\pi })^{1/60}{\frac {1}{(5\,\varphi )^{1/4}}}{\frac {1}{\sqrt {R(e^{-2\pi })}}}\\[6pt]&=1.00187093\dots \\[6pt]H(e^{-2\pi })&={\frac {1}{(e^{-2\pi })^{11/60}}}{\frac {1}{(5\,\varphi )^{1/4}}}{\sqrt {R(e^{-2\pi })}}\\[6pt]&=1.00000349\ldots \end{aligned}}}$

and,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}G(e^{-4\pi })&=(e^{-4\pi })^{1/60}{\frac {1}{(5\,\varphi ^{3})^{1/4}\,(\varphi +{\sqrt[{4}]{5}})^{1/4}}}{\frac {1}{\sqrt {R(e^{-4\pi })}}}\\[6pt]&=1.000003487354\dots \\[6pt]H(e^{-4\pi })&={\frac {1}{(e^{-4\pi })^{11/60}}}{\frac {1}{(5\,\varphi ^{3})^{1/4}\,(\varphi +{\sqrt[{4}]{5}})^{1/4}}}{\sqrt {R(e^{-4\pi })}}\\[6pt]&=1.000000000012\dots \end{aligned}}}$

and so on, with ${\displaystyle \varphi }$ as the golden ratio.

In the following we express the essential theorems of the Rogers-Ramanujan continued fractions R and S by using the tangential sums and tangential differences:

${\displaystyle a\oplus b=\tan {\bigl [}\arctan(a)+\arctan(b){\bigr ]}={\frac {a+b}{1-ab}}}$

${\displaystyle c\ominus d=\tan {\bigl [}\arctan(c)-\arctan(d){\bigr ]}={\frac {c-d}{1+cd}}}$

The elliptic nome and the complementary nome have this relationship to each other:

${\displaystyle \ln(q)\ln(q_{1})=\pi ^{2}}$

The complementary nome of a modulus k is equal to the nome of the Pythagorean complementary modulus:

${\displaystyle q_{1}(k)=q(k')=q({\sqrt {1-k^{2}}})}$

These are the reflection theorems for the continued fractions R and S:

${\displaystyle S(q)\oplus S(q_{1})=\Phi }$

${\displaystyle R(q^{2})\oplus R(q_{1}^{2})=\Phi ^{-1}}$

The letter ${\displaystyle \Phi }$ represents the Golden number exactly:

${\displaystyle \Phi ={\tfrac {1}{2}}({\sqrt {5}}+1)=\cot[{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(2)]=2\cos({\tfrac {1}{5}}{\pi })}$

${\displaystyle \Phi ^{-1}={\tfrac {1}{2}}({\sqrt {5}}-1)=\tan[{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(2)]=2\sin({\tfrac {1}{10}}{\pi })}$

The theorems for the squared nome are constructed as follows:

${\displaystyle R(q)^{2}R(q^{2})^{-1}\oplus R(q)R(q^{2})^{2}=1}$

${\displaystyle S(q)^{2}R(q^{2})^{-1}\ominus S(q)R(q^{2})^{2}=1}$

Following relations between the continued fractions and the Jacobi theta functions are given:

${\displaystyle S(q)\oplus R(q^{2})={\frac {\vartheta _{00}(q^{1/5})^{2}-\vartheta _{00}(q)^{2}}{5\,\vartheta _{00}(q^{5})^{2}-\vartheta _{00}(q)^{2}}}}$

${\displaystyle R(q)\ominus R(q^{2})={\frac {\vartheta _{01}(q)^{2}-\vartheta _{01}(q^{1/5})^{2}}{5\,\vartheta _{01}(q^{5})^{2}-\vartheta _{01}(q)^{2}}}}$

Into the now shown theorems certain values are inserted:

${\displaystyle S{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}\oplus S{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}=\Phi }$

Therefore following identity is valid:

${\displaystyle S{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(\Phi ){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi -{\tfrac {1}{4}}\arctan(2){\bigr ]}}$

In an analogue pattern we get this result:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-2\pi ){\bigr ]}\oplus R{\bigl [}\exp(-2\pi ){\bigr ]}=\Phi ^{-1}}$

Therefore following identity is valid:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-2\pi ){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(\Phi ^{-1}){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{4}}\arctan(2){\bigr ]}}$

Furthermore we get the same relation by using the above mentioned theorem about the Jacobi theta functions:

${\displaystyle S{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}\oplus R{\bigl [}\exp(-2\pi ){\bigr ]}=S(q)\oplus R(q^{2}){\bigl [}q=\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}=}$

${\displaystyle ={\frac {\vartheta _{00}(q^{1/5})^{2}-\vartheta _{00}(q)^{2}}{5\,\vartheta _{00}(q^{5})^{2}-\vartheta _{00}(q)^{2}}}{\bigl [}q=\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}=1}$

This result appears because of the Poisson summation formula and this equation can be solved in this way:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-2\pi ){\bigr ]}=1\ominus S{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}=1\ominus \tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi -{\tfrac {1}{4}}\arctan(2){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{4}}\arctan(2){\bigr ]}}$

By taking the other mentioned theorem about the Jacobi theta functions a next value can be determined:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}\ominus R{\bigl [}\exp(-2\pi ){\bigr ]}=R(q)\ominus R(q^{2}){\bigl [}q=\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}=}$

${\displaystyle ={\frac {\vartheta _{01}(q)^{2}-\vartheta _{01}(q^{1/5})^{2}}{5\,\vartheta _{01}(q^{5})^{2}-\vartheta _{01}(q)^{2}}}{\bigl [}q=\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}={\frac {{\sqrt[{4}]{5}}-1}{{\sqrt[{4}]{5}}+1}}={\sqrt[{4}]{5}}\ominus 1=\tan {\bigl [}\arctan({\sqrt[{4}]{5}}\,)-{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi {\bigr ]}}$

That equation chain leads to this tangential sum:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}=R{\bigl [}\exp(-2\pi ){\bigr ]}\oplus \tan {\bigl [}\arctan({\sqrt[{4}]{5}}\,)-{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi {\bigr ]}}$

And therefore following result appears:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{4}}\arctan(2)+\arctan({\sqrt[{4}]{5}}\,)-{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi {\bigr ]}}$

In the next step we use the reflection theorem for the continued fraction R again:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}\oplus R{\bigl [}\exp(-4\pi ){\bigr ]}=\Phi ^{-1}}$

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-4\pi ){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(2){\bigr ]}\ominus R{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}}$

And a further result appears:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-4\pi ){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{4}}\arctan(2)-\arctan({\sqrt[{4}]{5}}\,)+{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi {\bigr ]}}$

The reflection theorem is now used for following values:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}\oplus R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=\Phi ^{-1}}$

The Jacobi theta theorem leads to a further relation:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}\ominus R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=R(q)\ominus R(q^{2}){\bigl [}q=\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=}$

${\displaystyle ={\frac {\vartheta _{01}(q)^{2}-\vartheta _{01}(q^{1/5})^{2}}{5\,\vartheta _{01}(q^{5})^{2}-\vartheta _{01}(q)^{2}}}{\bigl [}q=\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}2\arctan({\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt {5}}-{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}+4{\sqrt {5}}}}+{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}-4{\sqrt {5}}}}\,)-{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi {\bigr ]}}$

By tangential adding the now mentioned two theorems we get this result:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}\oplus R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=\Phi ^{-1}\oplus \tan {\bigl [}2\arctan({\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt {5}}-{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}+4{\sqrt {5}}}}+{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}-4{\sqrt {5}}}}\,)-{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi {\bigr ]}}$

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}\arctan({\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt {5}}-{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}+4{\sqrt {5}}}}+{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}-4{\sqrt {5}}}}\,)-{\tfrac {1}{4}}\operatorname {arccot}(2){\bigr ]}}$

By tangential substraction that result appears:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}\oplus R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=\Phi ^{-1}\ominus \tan {\bigl [}2\arctan({\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt {5}}-{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}+4{\sqrt {5}}}}+{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}-4{\sqrt {5}}}}\,)-{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi {\bigr ]}}$

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{4}}\operatorname {arccot}(-2)-\arctan({\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt {5}}-{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}+4{\sqrt {5}}}}+{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}-4{\sqrt {5}}}}\,){\bigr ]}}$

In an alternative solution way we use the theorem for the squared nome:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{2}R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{-1}\oplus R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{2}=1}$

${\displaystyle {\bigl \{}R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{2}R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{-1}+1{\bigr \}}{\bigl \{}R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{2}+1{\bigr \}}=2}$

Now the reflection theorem is taken again:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=\Phi ^{-1}\ominus R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}}$

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}={\frac {1-\Phi R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}}{\Phi +R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}}}}$

The insertion of the last mentioned expression into the squared nome theorem gives that equation:

${\displaystyle {\biggl \{}R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{2}{\frac {\Phi +R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}}{1-\Phi R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}}}+1{\biggr \}}{\biggl \langle }R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}{\frac {{\bigl \{}1-\Phi R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}{\bigr \}}^{2}}{{\bigl \{}\Phi +R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}{\bigr \}}^{2}}}+1{\biggr \rangle }=2}$

Erasing the denominators gives an equation of sixth degree:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{6}+2\,\Phi ^{-2}R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{5}-{\sqrt {5}}\,\Phi ^{-1}R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{4}+}$

${\displaystyle +2\,{\sqrt {5}}\,\Phi R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{3}+{\sqrt {5}}\,\Phi ^{-1}R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}^{2}+2\,\Phi ^{-2}R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}-1=0}$

The solution of this equation is the already mentioned solution:

${\displaystyle R{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=\tan {\bigl [}\arctan({\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt {5}}-{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}+4{\sqrt {5}}}}+{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\sqrt[{3}]{6{\sqrt {30}}-4{\sqrt {5}}}}\,)-{\tfrac {1}{4}}\operatorname {arccot}(2){\bigr ]}}$

${\displaystyle R(q)}$ can be related to the Dedekind eta function, a modular form of weight 1/2, as,^[1]

${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{R(q)}}-R(q)={\frac {\eta ({\frac {\tau }{5}})}{\eta (5\tau )}}+1}$

${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{R^{5}(q)}}-R^{5}(q)=\left[{\frac {\eta (\tau )}{\eta (5\tau )}}\right]^{6}+11}$

The Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction can also be expressed in terms of the Jacobi theta functions. Recall the notation,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\vartheta _{10}(0;\tau )&=\theta _{2}(q)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{(n+1/2)^{2}}\\\vartheta _{00}(0;\tau )&=\theta _{3}(q)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{n^{2}}\\\vartheta _{01}(0;\tau )&=\theta _{4}(q)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }(-1)^{n}q^{n^{2}}\end{aligned}}}$

The notation ${\displaystyle \theta _{n}}$ is slightly easier to remember since ${\displaystyle \theta _{2}^{4}+\theta _{4}^{4}=\theta _{3}^{4}}$, with even subscripts on the LHS. Thus,

${\displaystyle R(x)=\tan {\biggl \{}{\frac {1}{2}}\operatorname {arccot} {\biggl [}{\frac {1}{2}}+{\frac {\theta _{4}(x^{1/5})[5\,\theta _{4}(x^{5})^{2}-\theta _{4}(x)^{2}]}{2\,\theta _{4}(x^{5})[\theta _{4}(x)^{2}-\theta _{4}(x^{1/5})^{2}]}}{\biggr ]}{\biggr \}}}$

${\displaystyle R(x)=\tan {\biggl \{}{\frac {1}{2}}\operatorname {arccot} {\biggl [}{\frac {1}{2}}+{\bigg (}{\frac {\theta _{2}(x^{1/10})\,\theta _{3}(x^{1/10})\,\theta _{4}(x^{1/10})}{2^{3}\,\theta _{2}(x^{5/2})\,\theta _{3}(x^{5/2})\,\theta _{4}(x^{5/2})}}{\bigg )}^{1/3}{\biggr ]}{\biggr \}}}$

${\displaystyle R(x)=\tan {\biggl \{}{\frac {1}{2}}\arctan {\biggl [}{\frac {1}{2}}-{\frac {\theta _{4}(x)^{2}}{2\,\theta _{4}(x^{5})^{2}}}{\biggr ]}{\biggr \}}^{1/5}\times \tan {\biggl \{}{\frac {1}{2}}\operatorname {arccot} {\biggl [}{\frac {1}{2}}-{\frac {\theta _{4}(x)^{2}}{2\,\theta _{4}(x^{5})^{2}}}{\biggr ]}{\biggr \}}^{2/5}}$

${\displaystyle R(x)=\tan {\biggl \{}{\frac {1}{2}}\arctan {\biggl [}{\frac {1}{2}}-{\frac {\theta _{4}(x^{1/2})^{2}}{2\,\theta _{4}(x^{5/2})^{2}}}{\biggr ]}{\biggr \}}^{2/5}\times \cot {\biggl \{}{\frac {1}{2}}\operatorname {arccot} {\biggl [}{\frac {1}{2}}-{\frac {\theta _{4}(x^{1/2})^{2}}{2\,\theta _{4}(x^{5/2})^{2}}}{\biggr ]}{\biggr \}}^{1/5}}$

Note, however, that theta functions normally use the nome q = e^iπτ, while the Dedekind eta function uses the square of the nome q = e^2iπτ, thus the variable x has been employed instead to maintain consistency between all functions. For example, let ${\displaystyle \tau ={\sqrt {-1}}}$ so ${\displaystyle x=e^{-\pi }}$. Plugging this into the theta functions, one gets the same value for all three R(x) formulas which is the correct evaluation of the continued fraction given previously,

${\displaystyle R{\big (}e^{-\pi }{\big )}={\frac {1}{2}}\varphi \,({\sqrt {5}}-\varphi ^{3/2})({\sqrt[{4}]{5}}+\varphi ^{3/2})=0.511428\dots }$

One can also define the elliptic nome,

${\displaystyle q(k)=\exp {\big [}-\pi K({\sqrt {1-k^{2}}})/K(k){\big ]}}$

The small letter k describes the elliptic modulus and the big letter K describes the complete elliptic integral of the first kind. The continued fraction can then be also expressed by the Jacobi elliptic functions as follows:

${\displaystyle R{\big (}q(k){\big )}=\tan {\biggl \{}{\frac {1}{2}}\arctan y{\biggr \}}^{1/5}\tan {\biggl \{}{\frac {1}{2}}\operatorname {arccot} y{\biggr \}}^{2/5}=\left\{{\frac {{\sqrt {y^{2}+1}}-1}{y}}\right\}^{1/5}\left\{y\left[{\sqrt {{\frac {1}{y^{2}}}+1}}-1\right]\right\}^{2/5}}$

with

${\displaystyle y={\frac {2k^{2}\,{\text{sn}}[{\tfrac {2}{5}}K(k);k]^{2}\,{\text{sn}}[{\tfrac {4}{5}}K(k);k]^{2}}{5-k^{2}\,{\text{sn}}[{\tfrac {2}{5}}K(k);k]^{2}\,{\text{sn}}[{\tfrac {4}{5}}K(k);k]^{2}}}.}$

One formula involving the j-function and the Dedekind eta function is this:

${\displaystyle j(\tau )={\frac {(x^{2}+10x+5)^{3}}{x}}}$

where ${\displaystyle x=\left[{\frac {{\sqrt {5}}\,\eta (5\tau )}{\eta (\tau )}}\right]^{6}.\,}$ Since also,

${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{R^{5}(q)}}-R^{5}(q)=\left[{\frac {\eta (\tau )}{\eta (5\tau )}}\right]^{6}+11}$

Eliminating the eta quotient ${\displaystyle x}$ between the two equations, one can then express j(τ) in terms of ${\displaystyle r=R(q)}$ as,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&j(\tau )=-{\frac {(r^{20}-228r^{15}+494r^{10}+228r^{5}+1)^{3}}{r^{5}(r^{10}+11r^{5}-1)^{5}}}\\[6pt]&j(\tau )-1728=-{\frac {(r^{30}+522r^{25}-10005r^{20}-10005r^{10}-522r^{5}+1)^{2}}{r^{5}(r^{10}+11r^{5}-1)^{5}}}\end{aligned}}}$

where the numerator and denominator are polynomial invariants of the icosahedron. Using the modular equation between ${\displaystyle R(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle R(q^{5})}$, one finds that,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&j(5\tau )=-{\frac {(r^{20}+12r^{15}+14r^{10}-12r^{5}+1)^{3}}{r^{25}(r^{10}+11r^{5}-1)}}\\[6pt]&j(5\tau )-1728=-{\frac {(r^{30}+18r^{25}+75r^{20}+75r^{10}-18r^{5}+1)^{2}}{r^{25}(r^{10}+11r^{5}-1)}}\end{aligned}}}$

Let ${\displaystyle z=r^{5}-{\frac {1}{r^{5}}}}$, then ${\displaystyle j(5\tau )=-{\frac {\left(z^{2}+12z+16\right)^{3}}{z+11}}}$

where

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&z_{\infty }=-\left[{\frac {{\sqrt {5}}\,\eta (25\tau )}{\eta (5\tau )}}\right]^{6}-11,\ z_{0}=-\left[{\frac {\eta (\tau )}{\eta (5\tau )}}\right]^{6}-11,\ z_{1}=\left[{\frac {\eta ({\frac {5\tau +2}{5}})}{\eta (5\tau )}}\right]^{6}-11,\\[6pt]&z_{2}=-\left[{\frac {\eta ({\frac {5\tau +4}{5}})}{\eta (5\tau )}}\right]^{6}-11,\ z_{3}=\left[{\frac {\eta ({\frac {5\tau +6}{5}})}{\eta (5\tau )}}\right]^{6}-11,\ z_{4}=-\left[{\frac {\eta ({\frac {5\tau +8}{5}})}{\eta (5\tau )}}\right]^{6}-11\end{aligned}}}$

which in fact is the j-invariant of the elliptic curve,

${\displaystyle y^{2}+(1+r^{5})xy+r^{5}y=x^{3}+r^{5}x^{2}}$

parameterized by the non-cusp points of the modular curve ${\displaystyle X_{1}(5)}$.

For convenience, one can also use the notation ${\displaystyle r(\tau )=R(q)}$ when q = e^2πiτ. While other modular functions like the j-invariant satisfies,

${\displaystyle j(-{\tfrac {1}{\tau }})=j(\tau )}$

and the Dedekind eta function has,

${\displaystyle \eta (-{\tfrac {1}{\tau }})={\sqrt {-i\tau }}\,\eta (\tau )}$

the functional equation of the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction involves^[2] the golden ratio ${\displaystyle \varphi }$,

${\displaystyle r(-{\tfrac {1}{\tau }})={\frac {1-\varphi \,r(\tau )}{\varphi +r(\tau )}}}$

Incidentally,

${\displaystyle r({\tfrac {7+i}{10}})=i}$

There are modular equations between ${\displaystyle R(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle R(q^{n})}$. Elegant ones for small prime n are as follows.^[3]

For ${\displaystyle n=2}$, let ${\displaystyle u=R(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle v=R(q^{2})}$, then ${\displaystyle v-u^{2}=(v+u^{2})uv^{2}.}$

For ${\displaystyle n=3}$, let ${\displaystyle u=R(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle v=R(q^{3})}$, then ${\displaystyle (v-u^{3})(1+uv^{3})=3u^{2}v^{2}.}$

For ${\displaystyle n=5}$, let ${\displaystyle u=R(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle v=R(q^{5})}$, then ${\displaystyle v(v^{4}-3v^{3}+4v^{2}-2v+1)=(v^{4}+2v^{3}+4v^{2}+3v+1)u^{5}.}$

Or equivalently for ${\displaystyle n=5}$, let ${\displaystyle u=R(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle v=R(q^{5})}$ and ${\displaystyle \varphi ={\tfrac {1+{\sqrt {5}}}{2}}}$, then ${\displaystyle u^{5}={\frac {v\,(v^{2}-\varphi ^{2}v+\varphi ^{2})(v^{2}-\varphi ^{-2}v+\varphi ^{-2})}{(v^{2}+v+\varphi ^{2})(v^{2}+v+\varphi ^{-2})}}.}$

For ${\displaystyle n=11}$, let ${\displaystyle u=R(q)}$ and ${\displaystyle v=R(q^{11})}$, then ${\displaystyle uv(u^{10}+11u^{5}-1)(v^{10}+11v^{5}-1)=(u-v)^{12}.}$

Regarding ${\displaystyle n=5}$, note that ${\displaystyle v^{10}+11v^{5}-1=(v^{2}+v-1)(v^{4}-3v^{3}+4v^{2}-2v+1)(v^{4}+2v^{3}+4v^{2}+3v+1).}$

Ramanujan found many other interesting results regarding ${\displaystyle R(q)}$.^[4] Let ${\displaystyle a,b\in \mathbb {R} ^{+}}$, and ${\displaystyle \varphi }$ as the golden ratio.

If ${\displaystyle ab=\pi ^{2}}$ then,

${\displaystyle {\bigl [}R(e^{-2a})+\varphi {\bigl ]}{\bigl [}R(e^{-2b})+\varphi {\bigr ]}={\sqrt {5}}\,\varphi .}$

If ${\displaystyle 5ab=\pi ^{2}}$ then,

${\displaystyle {\bigl [}R^{5}(e^{-2a})+\varphi ^{5}{\bigl ]}{\bigl [}R^{5}(e^{-2b})+\varphi ^{5}{\bigr ]}=5{\sqrt {5}}\,\varphi ^{5}.}$

The powers of ${\displaystyle R(q)}$ also can be expressed in unusual ways. For its cube,

${\displaystyle R^{3}(q)={\frac {\alpha }{\beta }}}$

where

${\displaystyle \alpha =\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {q^{2n}}{1-q^{5n+2}}}-\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {q^{3n+1}}{1-q^{5n+3}}},}$

${\displaystyle \beta =\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {q^{n}}{1-q^{5n+1}}}-\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {q^{4n+3}}{1-q^{5n+4}}}.}$

For its fifth power, let ${\displaystyle w=R(q)R^{2}(q^{2})}$, then,

${\displaystyle R^{5}(q)=w\left({\frac {1-w}{1+w}}\right)^{2},\;\;R^{5}(q^{2})=w^{2}\left({\frac {1+w}{1-w}}\right)}$

The general quintic equation in Bring-Jerrard form:

${\displaystyle x^{5}-5x-4a=0}$

for every real value ${\displaystyle a>1}$ can be solved in terms of Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction ${\displaystyle R(q)}$ and the elliptic nome

${\displaystyle q(k)=\exp {\big [}-\pi K({\sqrt {1-k^{2}}})/K(k){\big ]}.}$

To solve this quintic, the elliptic modulus must first be determined as

${\displaystyle k=\tan[{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi -{\tfrac {1}{4}}\operatorname {arccsc}(a^{2})].}$

Then the real solution is

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&={\frac {2-{\bigl \{}1-R[q(k)]{\bigr \}}{\bigl \{}1+R[q(k)^{2}]{\bigr \}}}{{\sqrt {R[q(k)]\,R[q(k)^{2}]}}\,{\sqrt[{4}]{4\cot \langle 4\arctan\{S\}\rangle -3}}}}\\&={\frac {2-{\bigl \{}1-R[q(k)]{\bigr \}}{\bigl \{}1+R[q(k)^{2}]{\bigr \}}}{{\sqrt {R[q(k)]R[q(k)^{2}]}}\,{\sqrt[{4}]{{\frac {2}{S-1}}+{\frac {2}{S+1}}+{\frac {1}{S}}-S-3}}}}.\end{aligned}}}$

where ${\displaystyle S=R[q(k)]\,R^{2}[q(k)^{2}].}$. Recall in the previous section the 5th power of ${\displaystyle R(q)}$ can be expressed by ${\displaystyle S}$:

${\displaystyle R^{5}[q(k)]=S\left({\frac {1-S}{1+S}}\right)^{2}}$

${\displaystyle x^{5}-x-1=0}$

Transform to,

${\displaystyle ({\sqrt[{4}]{5}}x)^{5}-5({\sqrt[{4}]{5}}x)-4({\tfrac {5}{4}}{\sqrt[{4}]{5}})=0}$

thus,

${\displaystyle a={\tfrac {5}{4}}{\sqrt[{4}]{5}}}$

${\displaystyle k=\tan[{\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi -{\tfrac {1}{4}}\operatorname {arccsc}(a^{2})]={\tfrac {5^{5/4}+{\sqrt {25{\sqrt {5}}-16}}}{5^{5/4}+{\sqrt {25{\sqrt {5}}+16}}}}}$

${\displaystyle q(k)=0.0851414716\dots }$

${\displaystyle R[q(k)]=0.5633613184\dots }$

${\displaystyle R[q(k)^{2}]=0.3706122329\dots }$

and the solution is:

${\displaystyle x={\frac {2-{\bigl \{}1-R[q(k)]{\bigr \}}{\bigl \{}1+R[q(k)^{2}]{\bigr \}}}{{\sqrt {R[q(k)]\,R[q(k)^{2}]}}\,{\sqrt[{4}]{20\cot \langle 4\arctan\{R[q(k)]\,R[q(k)^{2}]^{2}\}\rangle -15}}}}=1.167303978\dots }$

and can not be represented by elementary root expressions.

${\displaystyle x^{5}-5x-4{\Bigl (}{\sqrt[{4}]{\tfrac {81}{32}}}{\Bigr )}=0}$

thus,

${\displaystyle a={\sqrt[{4}]{\tfrac {81}{32}}}}$

Given the more familiar continued fractions with closed-forms,

${\displaystyle r_{1}=R{\big (}e^{-\pi }{\big )}={\tfrac {1}{2}}\varphi \,({\sqrt {5}}-\varphi ^{3/2})({\sqrt[{4}]{5}}+\varphi ^{3/2})=0.511428\dots }$

${\displaystyle r_{2}=R{\big (}e^{-2\pi }{\big )}={\sqrt[{4}]{5}}\,\varphi ^{1/2}-\varphi =0.284079\dots }$

${\displaystyle r_{4}=R{\big (}e^{-4\pi }{\big )}={\tfrac {1}{2}}\varphi \,({\sqrt {5}}-\varphi ^{3/2})(-{\sqrt[{4}]{5}}+\varphi ^{3/2})=0.081002\dots }$

with golden ratio ${\displaystyle \varphi ={\tfrac {1+{\sqrt {5}}}{2}}}$ and the solution simplifies to

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&={\sqrt[{4}]{5}}\,{\frac {2-{\bigl \{}1-r_{1}{\bigr \}}{\bigl \{}1+r_{2}{\bigr \}}}{{\sqrt {r_{1}\,r_{2}}}\,{\sqrt[{4}]{20\cot \langle 4\arctan\{r_{1}\,r_{2}^{2}\}\rangle -15}}}}\\[6pt]&={\sqrt[{4}]{5}}\,{\frac {2-{\bigl \{}1-r_{2}{\bigr \}}{\bigl \{}1+r_{4}{\bigr \}}}{{\sqrt {r_{2}\,r_{4}}}\,{\sqrt[{4}]{20\cot \langle 4\arctan\{r_{2}\,r_{4}^{2}\}\rangle -15}}}}\\[6pt]&={\sqrt[{4}]{8}}=1.681792\dots \end{aligned}}}$

• Rogers, L. J. (1894), "Second Memoir on the Expansion of certain Infinite Products", Proc. London Math. Soc., s1-25 (1): 318–343, doi:10.1112/plms/s1-25.1.318
• Berndt, B. C.; Chan, H. H.; Huang, S. S.; Kang, S. Y.; Sohn, J.; Son, S. H. (1999), "The Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction" (PDF), Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 105 (1–2): 9–24, doi:10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00033-3

• Weisstein, Eric W. "Rogers-Ramanujan Identities". MathWorld.
• Weisstein, Eric W. "Rogers-Ramanujan Continued Fraction". MathWorld.