Juan Pérez Nájera
Juan Pérez Nájera | |
---|---|
Born | Juan Pérez Nájera[1] 1845[2] Castroviejo, Spain |
Died | 1939[3] Burjassot, Spain |
Occupation | entrepreneur |
Known for | military, politician |
Political party | Carlism |
Juan José Pérez Nájera (1845-1939) was a Spanish politician and military. He has not risen to major honors either in politics or in the army, nonetheless in mostly theoretical legitimist troops he was nominated to the rank of a general. He remains a rather unique case of an individual who for 70 years was actively serving his political cause; from the late 1860s till the mid-1930s he supported Carlism. Though in the 1890s he aspired to the parliament, his political climax fell on the early 1930s; at the time he animated a somewhat dissident current within Traditionalism, later to develop into so-called carloctavismo. He demonstrated exceptional vitality: at the age of 68 he conceived a child, at the age of 72 he engaged in a street fight, and at the age of 89 he co-led a political faction.
Family and youth
The sole Nájera's[4] male ancestor identified is his father, Francisco Pérez Marín.[5] In the mid-19th century he was related to the county of Nájera in Rioja Alta, in the province of Logroño (Old Castile). He was married to Benita Nájera[6] (died 1901);[7] none of the sources consulted provides any information about her. In the 1840s the couple lived in the village of Castroviejo; in the early 1850s they moved to the neighboring one of Santa Coloma,[8] though they maintained some property in Castroviejo in the 1860s[9] and 1870s.[10] The family formed part of upper layer of the working class, since they counted among well-off farmers. One source lists Pérez Marín as belonging to the category of "honrados labradores",[11] another one refers to him as "propietario bien acomodado".[12] His agricultural economy was about stock-breeding, as in 1857 he was nominated visitador de ganaderías y cañadas, a livestock inspector, in the Nájera district.[13] As late as in the late 1880s he was noted as engaged in petty legal disputes, related to his animal husbandry business.[14] He rose to local prestige, in the 1850s serving as alcalde of Santa Coloma and juez municipal.[15]
It is not clear how many children Francisco and Benita had; there are Pedro,[16] Francisco[17] and Manuel[18] Pérez Nájera noted in Santa Coloma, while Pascual and Luciano Pérez Nájera lived at the time in Castroviejo,[19] but it is not known whether they were José's siblings. Numerous sources claim that following his early education the teenage boy entered the religious path and joined a local seminary, probably in the early 1860s.[20] However, there is no agreement as to details. Some point to the seminary in Calahorra,[21] some to the one in Logroño[22] and some mention few "seminarios conciliares de su provincia".[23] He spent 6 years training to be a priest; in 1868 he abandoned the seminary, as according to later hagiographic accounts he decided to serve the Almighty not in a cassock and with a prayer book, but in a uniform and with a rifle.[24]
Private life of Nájera remains somewhat of a mystery. A later author claims that he "gained a family" during his spell in South America in the early 1880s, but provides no details.[25] One confusing press note mentioned Dolores Lorente Puerta (1836-1904) as related,[26] but according to another one she was rather Nájera's mother-in-law and his wife was named Pérez Lorente.[27] One more source claims his wife - perhaps another one - died 22 days after his death, in 1939.[28] Nájera had at least 4 children. Francisco died at the age of 12 months in 1914[29] and Bonifacio, in 1931 referred as "joven",[30] was killed by the Republicans in 1938.[31] Two daughters were noted as "señoritas" in the late 1910s; they were referred to as Ascensión and María Pérez Nájera, for some reason having both apellidos of their father.[32] Ascensión died "en la primavera de la vida" in 1920.[33] Maria reportedly took care of Nájera during his senility.[34] Her further fate is unknown.
Junior officer (1868-1874)
Nájera's parents were Carlists, which in the early 1870s cost them property embargo, expropriation[36] and then incarceration.[37] The teenager inherited their Traditionalist outlook and following the Glorious Revolution he abandoned the seminary to fight Liberalism on battlefields. In the late 1860s Nájera entered conspiracy, yet sources provide confusing data. Some claim that in January 1869 he was captured by the Voluntarios de la Libertad militia in Corella and spent 3 weeks shuttled between various prisons in Navarre and Rioja before being set free;[38] afterwards he engaged in the 1869 electoral campaign.[39] However, also in early 1870 the press reported him incarcerated.[40] Once liberated he was immersed in conspiracy and perhaps also combat during a minor rising called Escodada, territorially limited to Rioja and Vascongadas.[41] He then fled to France, and was nominated alférez de infantería.[42] Upon return to Spain in late 1870 Nájera resumed conspiring, first in Burgos and then in Zaragoza.[43] Promoted to lieutenant,[44] following outbreak of war in April 1872 he left Aragón and returned home.[45]
Sometime in late spring 1872[46] Nájera crossed the Liberal-Carlist frontline at the Ebro[47] and made it to Cegama.[48] Some claim he was first incorporated into general staff of general Fulgencio Carasa,[49] but most maintain that he was nominated ADC to general Antonio Lizárraga.[50] He accompanied his superior during skirmishes in Sierra de Urbasa[51] and was decorated,[52] before in the summer of 1872 he again crossed to France.[53] Back in early 1873 he initially went on with Lizárraga, but then assumed command of minor detachments and took part in combat in western Gipuzkoa;[54] he got promoted to captain.[55] Governmental press listed him as killed-in-action.[56]
In late spring of 1873 Nájera assumed command of a scouting unit named Guías de Castilla, which fought in south-western Gipuzkoa (Azpeitia, Abalcisqueta, Astigarreta) and Rioja (Peñacerrada);[57] he again got decorated.[58] His first full-scale battle was in Navarre; during the engagement at Eraul he personally led a victorious bayonet charge on enemy artillery positions[59] and was awarded the Laureada.[60] He was then moved to the rear, entrusted with raising a battalion composed of Castilian volunteers from Palencia. According to some sources it was named Batallón de Cazadores 1.° del Cid,[61] but other claim it was rather "quinto batallón de Castilla",[62] named also 5. Cazadores de Palencia.[63] Again, there is discrepancy as to Nájera's exact position. There are works which claim that from the onset he commanded the battalion,[64] but other authors maintain that initially he was the deputy commander.[65] Allegedly at this role he led the unit in early 1874 in Vizcaya, first during the action at Muñecas[66] and then during extremely brutal fighting in Pucheta and San Pedro Abanto,[67] both having been part of the Battle of Somorrostro, lost by the Carlists. His unit dispersed 2 enemy battalions of marine infantry;[68] this produced Nájera's rising to major.[69]
Senior officer (1874-1876)
Following the successful counter-offensive, mounted by troops of the Madrid government in Biscay, in the early summer of 1874 the frontline rolled back to Navarre. With his Palencian battalion (either as commander or as deputy commander) Nájera took part in victorious battles at Abárzuza (July) and Oteiza (August), and then in the undecided battle of Oyarzún (November).[70] In the autumn of 1874 the Madrid administration declared him fugitive and deserter, since he had not reported as a conscript to obligatory military service; for a few years this would remain merely an empty gesture.[71] At the time he was already leading few hundred men in army of the Estella-based government; in February 1875 Nájera commanded them during the victorious Battle of Lácar,[72] which according to some authors resulted in his another promotion, namely to teniente coronel.[73]
In the spring of 1875 Nájera's unit was moved to Álava, and according to some it was only at this point when he was appointed Jefe del Batallón de Cazadores de Palencia.[74] For gallantry demonstrated during defensive action near Carrasquedo (June), at the border between the provinces of Álava and Burgos, where his unit kept their ground against 3 enemy battalions, Nájera got one more medal[75] and according to some, his promotion to sub-colonel came only then.[76] In late summer his unit kept fighting in the Burgos province, engaged in skirmishes at Arlanzón (August), before another enemy offensive forced them to withdraw to Navarre; defensive engagements at Mañeru and Santa Barbara followed.[77]
In Navarre in mid-1875 Nájera changed command; he abandoned the unit he had been leading for 2 years, the battalion of Palencian volunteers (depending upon sources numbered either 1. or 5.), and assumed leadership of another Castilian battalion (numbered 2.), named the Batallón de Cazadores de Arlanzón.[78] At that point, in the autumn of 1875, both the Carlist state and the Carlist army were crumbling, heavily outnumbered by troops loyal to Madrid. Nájera's engagements were reduced to defensive actions in northern Navarre, the last Carlist stronghold; in January 1876 he defended the sector next to the Pyrenean frontier with France around the city of Vera de Bidasoa.[79] In February he commanded whatever troops remained under his command trying to resist enemy advance during fighting at Peña Plata and Palomeras de Echalar.[80] His last task was ensuring that the claimant Carlos VII could safely withdraw to France; he moved to the Roncesvalles sector and performed gendarmerie role, engaged in combat against mutinous Carlist sub-units which were about to surrender.[81] Two days before his king crossed the frontier, he promoted Nájera to full colonel and decorated him with another honor.[82] Following 4 years of almost continuous wartime engagement, on the last day of February 1876 Nájera crossed to France and laid down his arms.[83]
In transition (1876-1888)
A monographic work on Carlist exile in France does not mention Nájera.[84] According to a hagiographic source the Madrid government offered Nájera the rank of a colonel,[85] which he refused claiming that "the standard might be abandoned, but never betrayed".[86] Another source claims the opposite, namely that upon return from brief exile he was persecuted, which triggered his decision to move overseas.[87] He left Europe for America either in late 1876[88] or in early 1877;[89] other motives quoted are that he sought better luck[90] or that he acted upon instructions of his king, who directed him towards Cuba.[91] However, there is no confirmation that Nájera has ever arrived in the Caribbean; it is known that in 1883 he resided in Cerro Largo in Uruguay[92] and - either before or after - in Brazil.[93] Sources agree that in America Nájera was engaged in some sort of business; one author claims he was dedicated to commerce[94] and another, of poor credibility,[95] asserts that in the New World he "made a fortune".[96] He returned to Spain no later than in 1885, reportedly because he believed that upon death of Alfonso XII, Carlos VII would again reach for the throne, even it takes another war.[97]
Back in his native Rioja, in 1886 in Logroño Nájera was detained as a deserter, the charge related to his 1874 no-show in the governmental army.[98] It is not clear how much time he spent behind bars, though sources agree that he paid his way off military service; some claim he was set free in 1887,[99] and some point rather to 1888.[100] Afterwards he settled in Madrid, where he would permanently reside during the following 5 decades;[101] he would visit Castroviejo and Santa Coloma only during the summer periods.[102] It remains obscure what he was doing for a living, e.g. whether he lived off the fortune made in America or retained some property in Rioja. In the 1890s he set up a customs agency, with offices in Irún and Madrid.[103] At later stages he was also engaged in exploration of salt ponds near Tortosa, a business held jointly with another Carlist veteran Felipe de Sabater de Prat, though it would soon turn into a legal conflict over property, with juridical proceedings going on until the mid-1910s.[104]
In the late 1880s Traditionalism was increasingly divided between followers of the claimant, Carlos VII, and supporters of the key party theorist and de facto political leader, Ramón Nocedal, who intended to de-emphasize dynastical threads in favor of religious intransigence. Nájera counted among the Nocedalistas and remained a subscriber of their flagship newspaper, El Siglo Futuro.[105] However, when the controversy exploded into an open showdown, and when the Nocedalistas broke away to form a new current, known as Integrism, Nájera did not follow suit. Lambasting "errores y extravíos" he cancelled the subscription[106] and in an open letter, published in the press, referred contemptuously to "a certain Ramón Nocedal".[107] Liberal press reported the conflict, including the stand taken by Nájera, with sheer delight.[108]
Madrid: second row (1888-1898)
Though merely in his mid-40s, in the late 1880s Nájera appeared at Carlist meetings next to Traditionalist leaders; this was the case e.g. during a banquet staged in Madrid to declare loyalty to the claimant Carlos VII and castigate the breakaways, when he was sitting next to Jefé Delagado, Marqués de Cerralbo.[109] In 1892 he published in legitimist press his brief wartime account.[110] During the 1893 electoral campaign to the lower chamber of the Cortes he stood in his native Torecilla-Nájera district as one of 29 Carlist candidates nationwide.[111] His only rival was a liberal Riojan cacique Lorenzo Codes García, Marqués del Romeral. For Nájera the campaign ended disastrously; Romeral got 8 times more votes (5,659 vs. 714), even though in some locations, like Badarán, Nájera was more popular; he lost even in his native villages of Castroviejo and Santa Coloma.[112] Following this experience, Nájera would never again join any electoral race.
In 1894 the claimant promoted Nájera to the rank of general de brigada,[113] a purely theoretical nomination since at the time there was neither a Carlist army nor even a Carlist paramilitary organization operational. This allowed him to bask in more prestige, but did not translate into any power within the party structures; his only official position known was president of "junta del distrito" in Badarán.[114] He entered neither provincial Madrid nor regional Castilian executive and did not count among the Traditionalist decision-makers; a large academic historiographic monograph on jefatura of Marqués de Cerralbo, covering the 1890s and the 1900s, mentions Nájera only in relation to his failed Cortes bid.[115] In the mid-1890s his only activity identified was very sporadically publishing belligerent notes in the flagship Carlist newspaper, El Correo Español, e.g. against the Anglican bishop Juan Bautista Cabrera Ibarz.[116]
In the late 1890s the Carlist organization was gearing up towards another violent action, be it a coup or a rising; the intention was to take advantage of national uproar following disastrous defeat in war against the United States in 1898. There is relatively little known of this conspiracy, which eventually boiled down to unrest - unauthorized by the claimant - in few single cities. According to a much later information provided by a Carlist author who knew Nájera personally, the latter took part in preparations to the rising,[117] yet present-day scholars who tried to approach the subject did not mention him among the protagonists.[118] Carlist moguls who were pushing for action regardless of the royal approval or merely those who failed to prevent the attempts fell in disregard; Cerralbo was dismissed and replaced by Matias Barrio y Mier. However, none of the sources consulted claims the royal wrath affected also Nájera.[119]
Madrid: first row (1898-1919)
In the early 20th century the press started to publish first notes about Nájera's health problems, usually when they were adversely affecting his presence on local party rallies in Madrid, e.g. in 1903[120] or 1904.[121] However, every some time he was mentioned as taking part in various veladas in the capital, e.g. in 1905,[122] 1907,[123] 1908[124] or 1909;[125] on exceptional basis he attended also Traditionalist events organized elsewhere, e.g. in Barcelona.[126] In 1907 he was for the first time noted as vice-president of the Madrid círculo.[127] By the end of the decade, as vice-president but also basking in his prestige of a general, he engaged in electoral campaigns of Carlist candidates running for the Cortes, e.g. in 1908 travelling to the Navarrese Tudela to support Lorenzo Sáenz y Fernández Cortina.[128] In 1909 he entered an internal Comisión Gestora, a committee entrusted with collecting money and purchase of premises supposed to host Casa de los Tradicionalistas, the future Carlist political centre in Madrid.[129] The project was crowned with success in 1912[130] and in 1913 Nájera assumed presidency of Junta Directiva of Casa de los Tradicionalistas.[131] He was also in collective presidency of some events[132] and featured prominently in propaganda prints, e.g. earning 5 pages in a 1912 book on Carlist heroes of the past.[133] Since the mid-1910s both his young daughters, Ascensión and María, were very active in Madrid, performing during Traditionalist literary and artistic evenings.[134]
Since 1909 Carlism was again suffering from internal conflict, this time between the new claimant Don Jaime and the chief party theorist and sort of celebrity, Juan Vázquez de Mella, with the party leader Cerralbo somewhat leaning towards the latter. There were different points of contention: weight of the dynastic ingredient, party strategy of alliances, position versus belligerent parties during the Great War, and last but not least, clearly personal rivalry. Like de Mella and unlike the Francophile claimant, Nájera was an outspoken Germanophile.[135] However, in all other issues he sided with Jaime III; he was also on increasingly poor terms with Cerralbo.[136] Since the mid-1910s he formed the core of a strong Madrid-based anti-Mellista group, which included also Lorenzo Sáenz y Fernandez Cortina, Guillermo Izaga Ojembarrena, and Emilio Dean Berro.[137] The conflict was very personal, bitter and venomous; on individual basis it climaxed in a scene which scandalized the capital: during a street encounter between Nájera and de Mella they first "exchanged brief and energetic comments", then the 72-year-old Nájera slapped the 56-year-old de Mella, then the latter responded with a cane, and eventually it was passers-by who separated the two.[138] On political basis the conflict climaxed in early 1919; during a brief showdown de Mella tried to win the party over Don Jaime, failed and broke away to lead his own current of Traditionalism, known as Mellismo.[139]
Jaimista (1919-1929)
Nájera tried to mobilize support for the claimant when in 1919 he launched a Madrid weekly El Alerta,[140] yet there is no information on its lifetime. He participated in events, staged in the capital to demonstrate loyalty to Don Jaime.[141] When in late 1919 the latter called a grand assembly, supposed to set direction for the future and known as Magna Junta de Biarritz, Nájera did not attend, though he sent his letter of adhesion and identified with those gathered.[142] He featured as sort of a patriarch, an example of fidelity, who for half a century has been supporting the cause; El Correo Español printed excerpts from his statements next to its vignette.[143] Santa Coloma declared him hijo predilecto y adoptivo, a honorary citizen.[144]
Carlist structures included a youth branch named Requeté, ranging from leisure groupings to urban hit-squads. A bid to turn them into paramilitary, attempted by Joaquín Llorens, failed,[145] and because of political differences the relations between Llorens and Don Jaime became thorny.[146] In 1920 the claimant nominated Nájera the new leader; titled Jefe General de los Requetés[147] he received another promotion, from brigadier general to teniente general.[148] There is very little known about Nájera's leadership. In his manifesto he stressed peaceful threads when noting that "luchamos hoy en la organización, en la prensa, en la tribuna, en el mitín", yet he warned that as "the revolution keeps advancing", the militants must be ready for a moment when the liberal regime breaks down under its own ineptitude.[149] His specific actions, however, seem calibrated towards the veterans rather than towards the youth, e.g. when in 1920 he tried to organize an assembly of ex-combatants.[150]
The early 1920s marked the period when Nájera enjoyed most prestige with Carlism; he co-presided over Martires de la Tradición[151] and during another grand assembly in Zaragoza,[152] toured Levante[153] and Catalonia,[154] represented Don Jaime at various events[155] and was even mocked by hostile newspapers.[156] However, he failed to prevent ongoing decay of Requeté. When in 1922 Don Jaime issued instructions to turn the branch into "action groups", he turned not to Nájera but to the party leader, Marqués de Villores.[157] No source mentions Nájera as related to Requeté further on, though there is neither any which claims he was formally released as its leader.[158]
In 1924 the 79-year-old fell victim to a traffic accident,[159] yet once again he demonstrated enormous vitality and recovered. Also in 1924 he was decorated with the highest Carlist honor, Orden de la Legitimidad Proscrita.[160] However, in the mid-1920s Nájera disappeared almost entirely from the public eye, sporadically noted only on societé columns;[161] no source claims he has engaged in any of the primoderiverista institutions. He remained on excellent terms with the party leader for New Castile (of which Madrid formed part), Emilio Deán, and since 1929[162] with the following one, Lorenzó Fernandez de la Cortina.[163] In the late 1920s this group launched a new periodical supposed to be successor to the defunct El Correo Español, titled El Cruzado Español.[164]
Cruzadista (1929-1939)
El Cruzado from the onset hailed Nájera as a distinguished veteran of the cause.[165] When following the fall of Primo political life in Spain was resumed, in 1930 the 85-year-old travelled as far as to Villareal, to speak at the local party event.[166] The claimant Jaime III passed away in 1931; in Madrid Nájera co-presided over the funeral ceremony,[167] in the press noted as "invicto general Nájera".[168] The claim was assumed by Don Jaime's successor, the childless octogenarian Don Alfonso Carlos, which facilitated re-admission to Carlism of the Integristas and the Mellistas. Nájera and the circle of Madrid leaders were appalled to see the former breakaways assuming high positions in the party; "dimisiones in cascada" followed,[169] while Nájera refused to take a seat in the new national executive, Junta Suprema Tradicionalista.[170]
Another line of conflict proved more consequential. Rumors circulated that Don Alfonso Carlos sought understanding with the Alfonsist branch. The Madrid leaders behind El Cruzado were the most outspoken opponents of reconciliation; their quadrilátero dirigente was composed of Nájera, Cora, Belaústegui and Saenz.[171] In early 1932 Nájera headed[172] a group of Cruzadistas[173] who published an open letter, directed to their new king,[174] and an accompanying manifesto.[175] Given it was certain that the Carlist dynasty would extinguish, in polite yet firm terms they asked that Don Alfonso Carlos nominates his successor. The claimant received some signatories in Toulouse, though he refused to bow to any pressure;[176] as the Cruzadistas did not intend to step back, in April he disauthorised the periodical.[177] The conflict escalated when in June 1932 Nájera published a text, headlined ¿Disciplina carlista? ¡Si!... ¿Disciplina cesarista? ¡¡No!![178] Both sides preferred not to burn the bridges; the 1933 luxury album celebrating 100 years of Carlism dedicated 2 pages to Nájera, "el general de más edad superviviente",[179] and in 1934 he received a parade of 900 requetés in Zumarraga.[180] However, as the Cruzadistas refused to back down,[181] eventually Don Alfonso Carlos expulsed them.[182]
Nájera, who remained faithful during secessions of 1888 and 1919, for the first time found himself beyond loyalty to the claimant. The expulsed formed a group under a challenging name "Núcleo de la Lealtad"[183] and started to advance Don Carlos Pio as their candidate to the throne. Some authors claim that Nájera presided over a grand assembly in Zaragoza, organized by the rebels to select a new king,[184] but other sources do not confirm this.[185] Some Cruzadistas, including Nájera, were nearing fascistoid groups. He has always been known as a devoted café-goer;[186] in the mid-1930s in Café del Norte he was mixing with the likes of Ramiro Ledesma Ramos.[187] His fate afterwards is barely known. One source claims that in November 1936 with his daughter[188] and perhaps wife the 91-year-old moved to Burjassot, possibly escaping hardships of life in frontline-located Madrid.[189] It is not clear whether he learnt that his only remaining son had been killed in the capital in 1938.[190] He died few months before the end of the civil war.[191]
See also
Footnotes
- ^ full name referred after Boletín Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 11.11.74, available here. Few works advance the "Najera" spelling, compare José Luis Agudín Menéndez, En busca del diario perdido. El (Bi) semanario "El Cruzado Español" en la reconstrucción propagandística y organizativa del carlismo (1929-1932), [in:] Historia contemporánea 72 (2023) [furtherly referred as Agudín Menéndez 2023a], p. 441, José Luis Agudín Menéndez, El Siglo Futuro. Un diario carlista en tiempos republicanos (1931-1936), Zaragoza 2023, ISBN 9788413405667 [furtherly referred as Agudín Menéndez 2023b], p. 215, 223, 227. However, in most works, from the early 20th till the early 21st century, the spelling "Nájera" prevails, compare B. de Artagan [Reinaldo Brea], Principe heroico y soldados leales, Barcelona 1912, p. 234, Juan María Roma (ed.), Album histórico del carlismo, Barcelona 1933, p. 183, Melchor Ferrer, Historia del tradicionalismo español, vol. XXIX, Sevilla 1960, p. 102 and vol. XXX/I, Sevilla 1979, p. 43; Jordi Canal, El carlismo, Madrid 2000, ISBN 8420639478, p. 277, Juan Ramón de Andrés Martín, El cisma mellista. Historia de una ambición política, Madrid 2000, ISBN 9788487863820, p. 129, Francisco de las Heras y Borrero, Un pretendiente desconocido. Carlos de Habsburgo. El otro candidato de Franco, Madrid 2004, ISBN 8497725565, p. 22,34, 39, José María Zavala, Bastardos y Borbones. Los hijos desconocidos de la dinastía, Madrid 2011, ISBN 9788401347672, p. 188, Agustín Fernández Escudero, El Marqués de Cerralbo (1845–1922): biografía política [PhD thesis Universidad Complutense], Madrid 2012, p. 249, Jacek Bartyzel, Tradycjonalizm bez kompromisu, Radzymin 2023, ISBN 9788366480605, pp. 704, 705, 753, 885
- ^ almost all sources state the year of birth as 1845, compare Artagan 1912, p. 234, Roma 1933, p. 183, Ferrer 1960, p. 102, Enciclopedia Espasa 1921, p. 731 (and all later editions), Jaime del Burgo, Bibliografia del siglo XIX. Guerras carlistas, Pamplona 1978, ISBN 8423503429, p. 754, Bartyzel 2023, pp. 704-705, Juan Pérez Nájera entry, [in:] Real Academia de la Historia service, available here, and the press, see e.g. El Correo Español 22.02.20, available here. A single source claims 1844, La Rioja 07.07.1939, available here, though it gives the same daily date (June 24) as sources pointing to 1845, which suggests a typo
- ^ most sources claim Nájera died in 1938, sometimes specified as December 1938, compare Arsenio Guillermo Izaga, Los presos de Madrid, Madrid 1940, p. 460, Antonio Pérez de Olaguer, Juan Pérez Nájera entry, [in:] Enciclopedia universal ilustrada europeo-americana (Suplemento 1936 - 1939. 1.ª parte), Madrid-Barcelona 1944, p. 505, Ferrer 1960, p. 102, Bartyzel 2023, pp. 704-705. However, his obituary published by a Logroño priest Cipriano Galilea in May 1939 claims he died in January 1939, and provides numerous other details, La Rioja 07.05.39, available here. RAEH does not provide any date and prefers a question mark, compare Juan Pérez Nájera entry, [in:] Real Academia de la Historia service, available here. Given the 1939 obituary appears to be freshly written by an informed person, the year of 1939 is adopte here
- ^ the common Spanish convention is that in case the paternal surname, primer apellido, is a very popular one, in non-official usage only the maternal surname is referred. This pattern is followed also in this entry, and "Nájera" is used instead of "Pérez Nájera" or "Pérez". The protagonist himself used to sign as "Juan Pérez Nájera", compare e.g. El Correo Español 25.07.20, available here. In the press he was usually listed also as "Juan Pérez Nájera", compare La Prensa 19.11.17, available here. However, in the 20th century in friendly newspapers he might have been referred to as "general Nájera", compare El Correo Español 03.04.12, available here. Until 1914 it might have been a source of confusion, as mainstream press when mentioning "general Nájera" usually referred to general Manuel Nájera y Pérez Cabrero (1854-1914), compare El Heraldo Militar 03.04.14, available here
- ^ Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 12.02.76, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 22.02.20, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 11.05.01, available here
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 12 15.01.62, available here
- ^ Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 08.11.77, available here
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 234
- ^ El Correo Español 22.02.20, available here
- ^ Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 14.06.84, available here, also Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 14.04.86, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 22.02.20, available here
- ^ La Rioja 06.10.01, available here
- ^ Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 15.07.01, available here
- ^ Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 11.08.02, available here
- ^ Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 02.04.06, available here
- ^ he spent 6 years in the seminary, La Rioja 07.05.39, available here. Given he abandoned the religious career in 1868 or 1869, he must have commenced some time between 1861 and 1863
- ^ Juan Pérez Nájera entry, [in:] Real Academia de la Historia service, available here
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ Roma 1933, p. 183
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ "alli creó familia y fortuna", La Rioja 10.03.45, available here. The same author, Daniel Navarro, claims that Nájera returned to Spain in 1898, which is known to be incorrect
- ^ namely "señora madre" of Najera'son, but also wife to a certain Pelayo Pérez Tabuyo, compare El Correo Español 26.09.04, available here
- ^ for "madre política" see El Correo Español 19.09.04, available here. The same article claims Dolores Lorente Puerta was wife to Pelayo Pérez Tabuyo; the apellidos of their daughter and Nájera's wife would have been Pérez Lorente. However, no such person has been identified
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available < here
- ^ El Correo Español 26.09.04, available here
- ^ La Rioja 05.08.31, available here
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ normally they should have had only primer apellido after their father (Pérez), and segundo apellido after their mother. A child might have carried both apellidos after his/her mother if the father was unknown, which obviously is not the case of Nájera's children. In some cases a child born out of wedlock might have carried both surnames after his/her father. Another option is that Pérez Nájera married his relative, also named Nájera
- ^ El Debate 03.01.16, available here
- ^ Izaga 1940, p. 460
- ^ Carlists detained following the 1869 unrest. It is not clear whether Nájera is among them
- ^ El Correo Español 22.02.20, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 11.05.11, available here
- ^ Roma 1933, p. 183
- ^ Artagan 1912, pp. 234
- ^ allegedly also following the Corella detention, El Pensamiento Español 16.03.70, available here
- ^ Ferrer 1960, p. 102
- ^ with seniority from January 1869, Artagan 1912, p. 234
- ^ Roma 1933, p. 183
- ^ Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921, p. 731
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 235
- ^ reportedly after the battle of Oroquieta, La Rioja 07.05.39, available here. The battle took place in May 1872
- ^ the story has it that Nájera crossed the river attached to 2 empty casks of wine, La Rioja 07.05.39, available here, same version in Artagan 1912, p. 235
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 235
- ^ his position with Lizarraga might by stated as "ayudante", "secretario", or "ayudante-secretario", compare Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921. p. 731, La Rioja 07.05.39, available here, Antonio Pirala, Historia contemporanea. Anales desde 1843 hasta la conclusion de la actual guerra civil, vol. IV, Madrid 1877, p. 338
- ^ Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921, p. 731
- ^ Cruz Roja 1. clase del Mérito Militar, Artagan 1912, p. 235
- ^ Roma 1933, p. 184
- ^ during skirmishes at Arechavaleta, La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 236
- ^ after fightings in Peña de Larran numerous newspapers reported that "entre los muertos se halla un capitán carlista llamado Pérez Nájera", compare e.g. El Periodico para Todos 20.01.73, available here. The issue is not entirely clear. The surnames, the rank and the place match, though one can not exclude that perhaps the man referred was Nájera's brother or other relative. However, none of numerous later hagiographic accounts mentioned his sibling as killed in action. Three years later the Madrid administration apparently considered him killed on May 19, 1873, compare Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 06.05.76, available here
- ^ Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921, p. 731
- ^ with second Red Cross, Artagan 1912, p. 236
- ^ Roma 1933, p. 184
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here. Later sources claimed that with his charge Nájera has actually tipped the balance in favor of the Carlists, compare Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921, p. 731
- ^ Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921, p. 731
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ here that 1. Batallion was Cazadores del Cid, 2. de Arlanzón, 3. de Burgos, 4. NN, 5. Cazadores de Palencia, Francisco Apalategui Igarzabal, Karlisten eta liberalen gerra-kontaerak, Zarautz 2005, ISBN 8479074892, p. 403
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ Artagan 1912, pp. 236-237
- ^ Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921, p. 731, Artagan 1912, p. 237
- ^ Artagan 1912, pp. 236-237, Roma 1933, p. 184
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 22.02.20, available here
- ^ Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921, p. 731, Artagan 1912, p. 237
- ^ Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 11.11.74, available here
- ^ Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921, p. 731, Artagan 1912, p. 237
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 237
- ^ Roma 1933, p. 184
- ^ Encomienda de la Orden de Carlos III, Artagan 1912, p. 237
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921, p. 731, Artagan 1912, p. 237
- ^ El Correo Español 22.02.20, available here
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 237
- ^ Roma 1933, p. 184
- ^ Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europeo-Americana, vol. XVIII, Madrid 1921, p. 731
- ^ Medalla de plata de Carlos VII, Artagan 1912, p. 237
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ compare Edina Polácska, Karlista emigráció Franciaországban (1872–1876) [PhD thesis University of Szeged], Szeged 2008, also her Franciaország és a karlizmus (1868–1874), [in:] Aetas 1 (2007), pp. 63–85, and La France et le carlisme (1872–1877) – Expulsion des réfugiés carlistes en Belgique, à Cuba et en Algérie, [in:] Acta Universitatis Szegediensis. Acta Hispanica 7 (2003), pp. 47–56
- ^ La Rioja 10.03.45, available here
- ^ "a una bandera se lo puede abandonar; pero jamás marchanla con la traición", quoted after La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ La Rioja 10.03.45, available here, also Ferrer 1960, p. 102
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 238
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 238
- ^ "al terminar la guerra le dan el nombramiento de novel para Cuba", La Verdad 02.08.27, available here
- ^ Rigoleto 10.01.83, available here. This news should be approached carefuly, as the periodical in question was a satirical one
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 238
- ^ e.g. the author, Daniel Navarro, claims that Nájera returned to Spain in 1898, La Rioja 10.03.45, available here, while in fact he was noted in Spain already in the late 1880s
- ^ "alli creó familia y fortuna", La Rioja 10.03.45, available here
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 238
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 238, Roma 1933, p. 185
- ^ Boletín Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 10.03.87, available here
- ^ Boletín Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 24.03.84, available here
- ^ at least until the mid-1920s he lived in midst of Chamberri district, at calle Blasco de Garray, El Diario Español 29.01.24, available here
- ^ La Rioja 13.07.30, available here
- ^ El Cardo 23.05.95, available here
- ^ first information about the business comes from 1904, Correo Ibérico 25.02.04, available here. More detail about Salinas de Alfaques near Tortosa in Diario Oficial de Avisos de Madrid 27.08.12, available here. Nájera was in lawsuit against Felipe de Sabater de Prat, also a veteran Carlist commander from Third Carlist War, over inheritance of his brother, Diario Oficial de Avisos de Madrid 26.09.13, available here. The last information related to the conflict identified comes from 1916, compare Diario Oficial de Avisos de Madrid 05.04.16, available here
- ^ in 1888 El Siglo Futuro editorial board counted Nájera among "los más seguros y firmes amigos", El Siglo Futuro 25.02.88, available here
- ^ El Siglo Futuro 25.02.88, available here
- ^ "un tal Ramón Nocedal", La Unión Católica 26.03.88, available here
- ^ La Epoca 26.02.88, available here
- ^ El Intringulis 04.11.88, available here
- ^ the text online in El Estandarte Real IV/39 (1892), available here
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 238, Agustín Fernández Escudero, El Marqués de Cerralbo (1845–1922): biografía política [PhD thesis Universidad Complutense], Madrid 2012, p. 249
- ^ Boletin Oficial de la Provincia de Logroño 09.03.83, available here
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 238
- ^ El Correo Español 13.01.93, available here
- ^ compare Fernández Escudero 2012
- ^ El Correo Español 03.10.94, available here
- ^ Pérez de Olaguer 1944, p. 505
- ^ Fernández Escudero 2012, also González, Canal 1992
- ^ compare Fernández Escudero 2012, also Jordi Canal, Eduardo González Calleja, "No era la ocasión propicia...". La conspiración carlista de fin de siglo en un memorial a Don Carlos, [in:] Hispania 52/ 181 (1992), pp. 705-742
- ^ El Correo Español 07.01.03, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 07.01.04, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 07.04.05, available here
- ^ El Nacional 06.11.07, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 09.11.08, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 03.03.09, available here
- ^ El Tradicionalista 15.04.05, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 04.06.07, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 04.06.08, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 19.05.09, available here
- ^ La Correspondencia de España 07.03.12, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 17.10.13, available here
- ^ e.g. funeral service after the deceased Carlist queen, Doña Margarita, El Correo Español 29.01.10, available here
- ^ Artagan 1912, p. 234-238, In comparison, infante Alfonso Carlos, brother to the deceased Carlist king Carlos VII, earned 6 pages
- ^ see e.g. El Correo español 11.03.14, available here, El Correo español 13.04.14, available here, El Debate 03.01.16, available here, El Debate 07.02.16, available here, La Acción 20.03.16, available available here
- ^ Román Oyarzun, Historia del Carlismo, Madrid 1944, p. 495
- ^ Agudín Menéndez 2023a, p. 441, Agudín Menéndez 2023b, p. 215
- ^ Juan Ramón de Andrés Martín, El cisma mellista. Historia de una ambición política, Madrid 2000, ISBN 9788487863820, p. 129, Ferrer 1960, p. 102
- ^ the incident, which commenced when "cruzaron breves y enérgicas frases", took place in Paseo del Prado, La Prensa 19.11.17, available here
- ^ detailed discussion of the Mellista brakup in Andrés Martín 2000
- ^ Pérez de Olaguer 1944, p. 505
- ^ El Correo Español 26.07.19, available here
- ^ Ferrer 1960, p. 126
- ^ El Correo Español 06.10.19, available here
- ^ La Rioja 17.10.19, available here
- ^ Aróstegui 2013, pp. 53-56, Eduardo González Calleja, Paramilitarització i violencia politica a l’Espanya del primer terc de segle: el requeté tradicionalista (1900–1936), [in:] Revista de Girona 147 (1991), p. 70, Eduardo González Calleja, La razón de la fuerza: orden público, subversión y violencia política en la España de la Restauración, Madrid 1998, ISBN 9788400077785, p. 492, Jordi Canal i Morell, Banderas blancas, boinas rojas: una historia política del carlismo, 1876–1939, Madrid 2006, ISBN 9788496467347, p. 38
- ^ González Calleja 1991, p. 70
- ^ El Correo Español 22.02.20, available here, Ferrer 1960, p. 135
- ^ Pérez de Olaguer 1944, p. 505
- ^ El Correo Español 25.07.20, available here
- ^ La Ultima Hora 08.05.20, available here
- ^ for 1921 see e.g. El Correo Español 11.03.21, available here, for 1922 see e.g. El Debate 10.03.22, available here
- ^ during so-called Magna Asamblea de Zaragoza of 1921, Nájera was sitting behind the presidential table along Marqués de Villores, Pascual Comín, Lorenzo Sáenz and Esteban Bilbao, La Verdad 18.10.21, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 25.02.20, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 09.06.20, available here
- ^ El Correo Español 28.02.21, available here
- ^ La Campania de Gracia 09.07.21, available here
- ^ González Calleja 1991, p. 70
- ^ scholars believe that Nájera's tenure was insignificant, compare "la jefatura de Pérez Nájera sobre el Requeté no significó, al perecer, una revitalización de sus actividades", Aróstegui 2013, p. 67
- ^ El Tiempo 29.01.24, available here
- ^ La Cruz 14.03.24, available here
- ^ e.g. when he was leaving Madrid for summer holidays in Santa Coloma, La Rioja 13.07.30, available here
- ^ El Día Gráfico 26.04.29, available here
- ^ Agudín Menéndez 2023a, p. 441, Agudín Menéndez 2023b, p. 227
- ^ details in Agudín Menéndez 2023a. Nájera is not mentioned explictly as engaged in launch of the periodical, though he is noted as member of the inner circle behind it
- ^ El Cruzado Español 20.09.29, available here
- ^ El Cruzado Español 14.11.30, available here
- ^ El Cruzado Español 23.10.31, available here
- ^ El Cruzado Español 16.10.31, available here. It remains sort of curiosity that Nájera earned a few-line entry in a Czechoslovak scientific dictionary, see Nový velký ilustrovaný slovník naučný, vol. XIV, Praha 1931, p. 273: "Pérez Nájera Juan (* 1845), špan. politik, vůdce Karlistů, 1869 zatčen, později vedl Karlisty u Peňacerrady, rozhodl vítězství u Evaulu [sic!] a doprovázel Dona Carlose 1876 do Paříže"
- ^ Agudín Menendez 2023a, p. 442
- ^ Ferrer 1960, p. 102. In 1932 one newspaper referred to him as "vicepresidente de la Junta Regional de Castilla la Nueva". As such, he allegedly noted "hijos de los combatientes más de cien años contra la Revolución! Entre ellos no hay cooperadores encubiertos ni descubiertos de la República sin Dios!", El Pueblo 03.03.32, available here; the title in cuestion was a blasquista periodical, vehemently anti-Carlist, and its credibility is uncertain, especially that no other paper repeated the alleged frase
- ^ Agudín Menendez 2023a, p. 441
- ^ "encabezados por el general don Juan Pérez Nájera", Francisco de las Heras y Borrero, Un pretendiente desconocido. Carlos de Habsburgo. El otro candidato de Franco, Madrid 2004, ISBN 8497725565, p. 34
- ^ Pedro R. de Apodaca, Arturo Recondo, Emilio Deán, Ramón Comas, Rafael Hidalgo de Morillo, José Vicedo Calatayud, Bibiano Esteban, Jaime Martínez Rubio, Francisco A. Jiménez, Agudín Menendez 2023b, p. 223
- ^ El Castellano 29.02.32, available here
- ^ titled A todos los leales de la Tradición, Ferrer 1958 p. 113; it was signed by Pedro de Apodaca, Juan Pérez de Nájera, Antonio Redondo, Emilio Deán, Ramón Cómas, Rafael Hidalgo de Morillo, Juan Vicedo Calatayud, Bibiano Esteban, Jaime Martínez Rubio and Francisco A. Jiménez, Ferrer 1979, p. 43
- ^ Heras y Borrero 2004, p. 35
- ^ Agudín Menendez 2023b, p. 223
- ^ El Cruzado Español 07.06.32, available here
- ^ Roma 1933, pp. 183-184
- ^ Eduardo G. Calleja, Julio Aróstegui Sánchez, La tradición recuperada. El Requeté carlista y la insurrección, [in:] Historia contemporánea 11 (1994), p. 44
- ^ Nájera used to give ambiguous lectures like "Leales y rebeldes an la causa", El Debate 21.05.33, available here
- ^ exact year is not clear, since in 1933-1935 measures adopted by Don Alfonso Carlos versus the Cruzadistas were escalating in severity, see Heras y Borrero 2004, pp. 38-39, and wording of each of his statements might be subject to various interpretations. Some authors claim the expulsion took place in 1933, see Canal 2000, p. 306
- ^ Ferrer 1979, p. 70. Many authors from the onset, i.e. from the early 1931, refer to Cruzadistas and to Nucleo de la Lealtad, see e.g. Manuel de Santa Cruz, Apuntes y documentos para la historia del tradicionalismo español, vol. 3, Seville 1979, pp. 26–27
- ^ Heras y Borrero 2004, p. 39
- ^ according to the press the assembly was presided by Lorenzo Saénz, El Diario de Avila 20.05.35, available here, El Diario Palentino 20.05.35, available here
- ^ he might be referred to as "asistente a los cafés", compare Pueblo 11.04.58, available here
- ^ Agudín Menéndez 2023a, p. 456, Agudín Menéndez 2023b, p. 227
- ^ Izaga 1940, p. 460
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here. In March 1938 a newspaper issued in the Nationalist zone referred to him as "mártir vivente", see La Rioja 10.03.38, available here
- ^ La Rioja 07.05.39, available here
- ^ for late 1938 see Izaga 1940, p. 460, Pérez de Olaguer 1944, p. 505, Ferrer 1960, p. 102. For early 1939 see La Rioja 07.05.39, available here. RAEH does not provide any date, compare Juan Pérez Nájera entry, [in:] Real Academia de la Historia service, available here
Further reading
- José Luis Agudín Menéndez, En busca del diario perdido. El (Bi) semanario "El Cruzado Español" en la reconstrucción propagandística y organizativa del carlismo (1929-1932), [in:] Historia contemporánea 72 (2023), pp. 431-462
- B. de Artagan [Reinaldo Brea], Principe heroico y soldados leales, Barcelona 1912
- Melchor Ferrer, Historia del tradicionalismo español, vol. XXX/I, Sevilla 1979