Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A.
| Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Decided May 30, 2024 | |
| Full case name | Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A. |
| Citations | 602 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| The Second Circuit failed to analyze whether New York’s interest-on-escrow law was preempted as applied to national banks in a manner consistent with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N.A. v. Nelson. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Kavanaugh, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Nelson | |
Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., 602 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Second Circuit Court of Appeals failed to analyze whether New York’s interest-on-escrow law was preempted as applied to national banks in a manner consistent with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Nelson.[1]
References
External links
- Text of Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., 602 U.S. ___ (2024) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.