Bending of plates, or plate bending, refers to the deflection of a plate perpendicular to the plane of the plate under the action of external forces and moments. The amount of deflection can be determined by solving the differential equations of an appropriate plate theory. The stresses in the plate can be calculated from these deflections. Once the stresses are known, failure theories can be used to determine whether a plate will fail under a given load.
Bending of Kirchhoff-Love plates
Definitions
For a thin rectangular plate of thickness
, Young's modulus
, and Poisson's ratio
, we can define parameters in terms of the plate deflection,
.
The flexural rigidity is given by

Moments
The bending moments per unit length are given by


The twisting moment per unit length is given by

Forces
The shear forces per unit length are given by


Stresses
The bending stresses are given by


The shear stress is given by

Strains
The bending strains for small-deflection theory are given by


The shear strain for small-deflection theory is given by

For large-deflection plate theory, we consider the inclusion of membrane strains



Deflections
The deflections are given by


Derivation
In the Kirchhoff–Love plate theory for plates the governing equations are[1]

and

In expanded form,

and

where
is an applied transverse load per unit area, the thickness of the plate is
, the stresses are
, and

The quantity
has units of force per unit length. The quantity
has units of moment per unit length.
For isotropic, homogeneous, plates with Young's modulus
and Poisson's ratio
these equations reduce to[2]

where
is the deflection of the mid-surface of the plate.
Small deflection of thin rectangular plates
This is governed by the Germain-Lagrange plate equation

This equation was first derived by Lagrange in December 1811 in correcting the work of Germain who provided the basis of the theory.
Large deflection of thin rectangular plates
This is governed by the Föppl–von Kármán plate equations
![{\displaystyle {\cfrac {\partial ^{4}F}{\partial x^{4}}}+2{\cfrac {\partial ^{4}F}{\partial x^{2}\partial y^{2}}}+{\cfrac {\partial ^{4}F}{\partial y^{4}}}=E\left[\left({\cfrac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial x\partial y}}\right)^{2}-{\cfrac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial x^{2}}}{\cfrac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial y^{2}}}\right]}](./4a797f21006ff4d841374f445a8e54ab2b7fb279.svg)

where
is the stress function.
Circular Kirchhoff-Love plates
The bending of circular plates can be examined by solving the governing equation with
appropriate boundary conditions. These solutions were first found by Poisson in 1829.
Cylindrical coordinates are convenient for such problems. Here
is the distance of a point from the midplane of the plate.
The governing equation in coordinate-free form is

In cylindrical coordinates
,

For symmetrically loaded circular plates,
, and we have

Therefore, the governing equation is
![{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{r}}{\cfrac {d}{dr}}\left[r{\cfrac {d}{dr}}\left\{{\frac {1}{r}}{\cfrac {d}{dr}}\left(r{\cfrac {dw}{dr}}\right)\right\}\right]=-{\frac {q}{D}}\,.}](./9f8083e6e16a9118c0afe8bd3c7e1fe841e17334.svg)
If
and
are constant, direct integration of the governing equation gives us

where
are constants. The slope of the deflection surface is

For a circular plate, the requirement that the deflection and the slope of the deflection are finite
at
implies that
. However,
need not equal 0, as the limit
of
exists as you approach
from the right. However, if
, the second derivative of
will diverge at the center, corresponding to a point-like defect.
Clamped edges
For a circular plate with clamped edges, we have
and
at the edge of the plate (radius
). Using these boundary conditions and setting
, we get

The in-plane displacements in the plate are

The in-plane strains in the plate are

The in-plane stresses in the plate are
![{\displaystyle \sigma _{rr}={\frac {E}{1-\nu ^{2}}}\left[\varepsilon _{rr}+\nu \varepsilon _{\theta \theta }\right]~;~~\sigma _{\theta \theta }={\frac {E}{1-\nu ^{2}}}\left[\varepsilon _{\theta \theta }+\nu \varepsilon _{rr}\right]~;~~\sigma _{r\theta }=0\,.}](./3113afbe187db314e19db5772f1fb7ec65d5f2bf.svg)
For a plate of thickness
, the bending stiffness is
and we
have
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\sigma _{rr}&=-{\frac {3qz}{32h^{3}}}\left[(1+\nu )a^{2}-(3+\nu )r^{2}\right]\\\sigma _{\theta \theta }&=-{\frac {3qz}{32h^{3}}}\left[(1+\nu )a^{2}-(1+3\nu )r^{2}\right]\\\sigma _{r\theta }&=0\,.\end{aligned}}}](./8e9eae0c15eb3c3606cfcbfadf7e523df1069eae.svg)
The moment resultants (bending moments) are
![{\displaystyle M_{rr}=-{\frac {q}{16}}\left[(1+\nu )a^{2}-(3+\nu )r^{2}\right]~;~~M_{\theta \theta }=-{\frac {q}{16}}\left[(1+\nu )a^{2}-(1+3\nu )r^{2}\right]~;~~M_{r\theta }=0\,.}](./6fa27857c8e8ae81af9dc56fa29a74b33bc3dad8.svg)
The maximum radial stress is at
and
:

where
. The bending moments at the boundary and the center of the plate are

Rectangular Kirchhoff-Love plates
For rectangular plates, Navier in 1820 introduced a simple method for finding the displacement and stress when a plate is simply supported. The idea was to express the applied load in terms of Fourier components, find the solution for a sinusoidal load (a single Fourier component), and then superimpose the Fourier components to get the solution for an arbitrary load.
Sinusoidal load
Let us assume that the load is of the form

Here
is the amplitude,
is the width of the plate in the
-direction, and
is the width of the plate in the
-direction.
Since the plate is simply supported, the displacement
along the edges of
the plate is zero, the bending moment
is zero at
and
, and
is zero at
and
.
If we apply these boundary conditions and solve the plate equation, we get the
solution

Where D is the flexural rigidity

Analogous to flexural stiffness EI.[3] We can calculate the stresses and strains in the plate once we know the displacement.
For a more general load of the form

where
and
are integers, we get the solution

Navier solution
Double trigonometric series equation
We define a general load
of the following form

where
is a Fourier coefficient given by
.
The classical rectangular plate equation for small deflections thus becomes:

Simply-supported plate with general load
We assume a solution
of the following form

The partial differentials of this function are given by



Substituting these expressions in the plate equation, we have

Equating the two expressions, we have

which can be rearranged to give

The deflection of a simply-supported plate (of corner-origin) with general load is given by

Displacement (

)
Stress (

)
Stress (

)
Displacement and stresses along

for a rectangular plate with

mm,

mm,

mm,

GPa, and

under a load

kPa. The red line represents the bottom of the plate, the green line the middle, and the blue line the top of the plate.
For a uniformly-distributed load, we have

The corresponding Fourier coefficient is thus given by
.
Evaluating the double integral, we have
,
or alternatively in a piecewise format, we have

The deflection of a simply-supported plate (of corner-origin) with uniformly-distributed load is given by

The bending moments per unit length in the plate are given by


Lévy solution
Another approach was proposed by Lévy[4] in 1899. In this case we start with an assumed form of the displacement and try to fit the parameters so that the governing equation and the boundary conditions are satisfied. The goal is to find
such that it satisfies the boundary conditions at
and
and, of course, the governing equation
.
Let us assume that

For a plate that is simply-supported along
and
, the boundary conditions are
and
. Note that there is no variation in displacement along these edges meaning that
and
, thus reducing the moment boundary condition to an equivalent expression
.
Moments along edges
Consider the case of pure moment loading. In that case
and
has to satisfy
. Since we are working in rectangular
Cartesian coordinates, the governing equation can be expanded as

Plugging the expression for
in the governing equation gives us
![{\displaystyle \sum _{m=1}^{\infty }\left[\left({\frac {m\pi }{a}}\right)^{4}Y_{m}\sin {\frac {m\pi x}{a}}-2\left({\frac {m\pi }{a}}\right)^{2}{\cfrac {d^{2}Y_{m}}{dy^{2}}}\sin {\frac {m\pi x}{a}}+{\frac {d^{4}Y_{m}}{dy^{4}}}\sin {\frac {m\pi x}{a}}\right]=0}](./c4b7bc6c19d495de8e6086dc8866cf7571b323f9.svg)
or

This is an ordinary differential equation which has the general solution

where
are constants that can be determined from the boundary
conditions. Therefore, the displacement solution has the form
![{\displaystyle w(x,y)=\sum _{m=1}^{\infty }\left[\left(A_{m}+B_{m}{\frac {m\pi y}{a}}\right)\cosh {\frac {m\pi y}{a}}+\left(C_{m}+D_{m}{\frac {m\pi y}{a}}\right)\sinh {\frac {m\pi y}{a}}\right]\sin {\frac {m\pi x}{a}}\,.}](./f35b38c6ddc1b29b74377203666d669c5791b2cc.svg)
Let us choose the coordinate system such that the boundaries of the plate are
at
and
(same as before) and at
(and not
and
). Then the moment boundary conditions at the
boundaries are

where
are known functions. The solution can be found by
applying these boundary conditions. We can show that for the symmetrical case
where

and

we have

where

Similarly, for the antisymmetrical case where

we have

We can superpose the symmetric and antisymmetric solutions to get more general
solutions.
For a uniformly-distributed load, we have

The deflection of a simply-supported plate with centre
with uniformly-distributed load is given by

The bending moments per unit length in the plate are given by


For the special case where the loading is symmetric and the moment is uniform, we have at
,

Displacement (

)
Bending stress (

)
Transverse shear stress (

)
Displacement and stresses for a rectangular plate under uniform bending moment along the edges

and

. The bending stress

is along the bottom surface of the plate. The transverse shear stress

is along the mid-surface of the plate.
The resulting displacement is
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&w(x,y)={\frac {2M_{0}a^{2}}{\pi ^{3}D}}\sum _{m=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{(2m-1)^{3}\cosh \alpha _{m}}}\sin {\frac {(2m-1)\pi x}{a}}\times \\&~~\left[\alpha _{m}\,\tanh \alpha _{m}\cosh {\frac {(2m-1)\pi y}{a}}-{\frac {(2m-1)\pi y}{a}}\sinh {\frac {(2m-1)\pi y}{a}}\right]\end{aligned}}}](./05bb4b518f750d8e1aafd47fb079065c5c4a5786.svg)
where

The bending moments and shear forces corresponding to the displacement
are
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}M_{xx}&=-D\left({\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial x^{2}}}+\nu \,{\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial y^{2}}}\right)\\&={\frac {2M_{0}(1-\nu )}{\pi }}\sum _{m=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{(2m-1)\cosh \alpha _{m}}}\,\times \\&~\sin {\frac {(2m-1)\pi x}{a}}\,\times \\&~\left[-{\frac {(2m-1)\pi y}{a}}\sinh {\frac {(2m-1)\pi y}{a}}+\right.\\&\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \left.\left\{{\frac {2\nu }{1-\nu }}+\alpha _{m}\tanh \alpha _{m}\right\}\cosh {\frac {(2m-1)\pi y}{a}}\right]\\M_{xy}&=(1-\nu )D{\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial x\partial y}}\\&=-{\frac {2M_{0}(1-\nu )}{\pi }}\sum _{m=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{(2m-1)\cosh \alpha _{m}}}\,\times \\&~\cos {\frac {(2m-1)\pi x}{a}}\,\times \\&~\left[{\frac {(2m-1)\pi y}{a}}\cosh {\frac {(2m-1)\pi y}{a}}+\right.\\&\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \left.(1-\alpha _{m}\tanh \alpha _{m})\sinh {\frac {(2m-1)\pi y}{a}}\right]\\Q_{zx}&={\frac {\partial M_{xx}}{\partial x}}-{\frac {\partial M_{xy}}{\partial y}}\\&={\frac {4M_{0}}{a}}\sum _{m=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{\cosh \alpha _{m}}}\,\times \\&~\cos {\frac {(2m-1)\pi x}{a}}\cosh {\frac {(2m-1)\pi y}{a}}\,.\end{aligned}}}](./b46371a14545a06c6bb677179132a02137a8fbb4.svg)
The stresses are

Cylindrical plate bending
Cylindrical bending occurs when a rectangular plate that has dimensions
, where
and the thickness
is small, is subjected to a uniform distributed load perpendicular to the plane of the plate. Such a plate takes the shape of the surface of a cylinder.
Simply supported plate with axially fixed ends
For a simply supported plate under cylindrical bending with edges that are free to rotate but have a fixed
. Cylindrical bending solutions can be found using the Navier and Levy techniques.
Bending of thick Mindlin plates
For thick plates, we have to consider the effect of through-the-thickness shears on the orientation of the normal to the mid-surface after deformation. Raymond D. Mindlin's theory provides one approach for find the deformation and stresses in such plates. Solutions to Mindlin's theory can be derived from the equivalent Kirchhoff-Love solutions using canonical relations.[5]
Governing equations
The canonical governing equation for isotropic thick plates can be expressed as[5]

where
is the applied transverse load,
is the shear modulus,
is the bending rigidity,
is the plate thickness,
,
is the shear correction factor,
is the Young's modulus,
is the Poisson's
ratio, and
![{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}=D\left[{\mathcal {A}}\left({\frac {\partial \varphi _{1}}{\partial x_{1}}}+{\frac {\partial \varphi _{2}}{\partial x_{2}}}\right)-(1-{\mathcal {A}})\nabla ^{2}w\right]+{\frac {2q}{1-\nu ^{2}}}{\mathcal {B}}\,.}](./c93657927f897412a7df1207325d3a731bfa9fed.svg)
In Mindlin's theory,
is the transverse displacement of the mid-surface of the plate
and the quantities
and
are the rotations of the mid-surface normal
about the
and
-axes, respectively. The canonical parameters for this theory
are
and
. The shear correction factor
usually has the
value
.
The solutions to the governing equations can be found if one knows the corresponding
Kirchhoff-Love solutions by using the relations

where
is the displacement predicted for a Kirchhoff-Love plate,
is a
biharmonic function such that
,
is a function that satisfies the
Laplace equation,
, and

Simply supported rectangular plates
For simply supported plates, the Marcus moment sum vanishes, i.e.,

Which is almost Laplace`s equation for w[ref 6]. In that case the functions
,
,
vanish, and the Mindlin solution is
related to the corresponding Kirchhoff solution by

Bending of Reissner-Stein cantilever plates
Reissner-Stein theory for cantilever plates[6] leads to the following coupled ordinary differential equations for a cantilever plate with concentrated end load
at
.

and the boundary conditions at
are

Solution of this system of two ODEs gives
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}w_{x}(x)&={\frac {q_{x1}}{6bD}}\,(3ax^{2}-x^{3})\\\theta _{x}(x)&={\frac {q_{x2}}{2bD(1-\nu )}}\left[x-{\frac {1}{\nu _{b}}}\,\left({\frac {\sinh(\nu _{b}a)}{\cosh[\nu _{b}(x-a)]}}+\tanh[\nu _{b}(x-a)]\right)\right]\end{aligned}}}](./6a9eebb0810de812da44e1e62453b7af0aa8dddf.svg)
where
. The bending moments and shear forces corresponding to the displacement
are
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}M_{xx}&=-D\left({\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial x^{2}}}+\nu \,{\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial y^{2}}}\right)\\&=q_{x1}\left({\frac {x-a}{b}}\right)-\left[{\frac {3yq_{x2}}{b^{3}\nu _{b}\cosh ^{3}[\nu _{b}(x-a)]}}\right]\times \\&\quad \left[6\sinh(\nu _{b}a)-\sinh[\nu _{b}(2x-a)]+\sinh[\nu _{b}(2x-3a)]+8\sinh[\nu _{b}(x-a)]\right]\\M_{xy}&=(1-\nu )D{\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial x\partial y}}\\&={\frac {q_{x2}}{2b}}\left[1-{\frac {2+\cosh[\nu _{b}(x-2a)]-\cosh[\nu _{b}x]}{2\cosh ^{2}[\nu _{b}(x-a)]}}\right]\\Q_{zx}&={\frac {\partial M_{xx}}{\partial x}}-{\frac {\partial M_{xy}}{\partial y}}\\&={\frac {q_{x1}}{b}}-\left({\frac {3yq_{x2}}{2b^{3}\cosh ^{4}[\nu _{b}(x-a)]}}\right)\times \left[32+\cosh[\nu _{b}(3x-2a)]-\cosh[\nu _{b}(3x-4a)]\right.\\&\qquad \left.-16\cosh[2\nu _{b}(x-a)]+23\cosh[\nu _{b}(x-2a)]-23\cosh(\nu _{b}x)\right]\,.\end{aligned}}}](./23db4b670f6da6f2f18a0e2419ca828fbc73d657.svg)
The stresses are

If the applied load at the edge is constant, we recover the solutions for a beam under a
concentrated end load. If the applied load is a linear function of
, then

See also
References
- ^ Reddy, J. N., 2007, Theory and analysis of elastic plates and shells, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis.
- ^ Timoshenko, S. and Woinowsky-Krieger, S., (1959), Theory of plates and shells, McGraw-Hill New York.
- ^ Cook, R. D. et al., 2002, Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, John Wiley & Sons
- ^ Lévy, M., 1899, Comptes rendues, vol. 129, pp. 535-539
- ^ a b Lim, G. T. and Reddy, J. N., 2003, On canonical bending relationships for plates, International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 40,
pp. 3039-3067.
- ^ E. Reissner and M. Stein. Torsion and transverse bending of cantilever plates. Technical Note 2369, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics,Washington, 1951.