Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co.
Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co. | |
---|---|
Decided February 28, 1979 | |
Full case name | Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co. |
Citations | 440 U.S. 257 (more) |
Holding | |
Federal patent law does not preempt state contract law so as to preclude enforcement of the contract. | |
Court membership | |
|
Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 U.S. 257 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that federal patent law does not preempt state contract law so as to preclude enforcement of the contract.[1]
Description
The challenged law required the licensee of a patent-pending invention to pay a royalty to the inventor even if the patent was ultimately denied. The Supreme Court upheld the law because it did not cause anyone to decline to seek a patent or try to hide their disclosed inventions after the fact.[2]
References
External links
- Text of Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 U.S. 257 (1979) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.